The platform strengthens your HIS rather than replacing it: the doctor fills in the chart by voice and from a photo, ICD and service codes are filled in automatically, and every case is checked before it goes to the fund.
Complaints: cough, temperature up to 38.2°, weakness for 3 days. Examination: pharynx hyperemic, harsh breathing in the lungs, no wheezing.
On the left is what a typical visit looks like today. On the right is the same patient, the same HIS, but the platform assembles the documents.
This difference repeats across every one of the 20–30 visits a day – that is how you get −50–70% of charting time.
All of this is a layer on top of your HIS: KMIS, Damumed or another. The recording system stays the same, the manual work around it disappears.
The doctor talks through the visit – the platform writes up the complaints, examination and diagnosis. A completed paper form only needs to be photographed: the data is recognized and lands in the chart in seconds.
History: ill since 12.06, took an antipyretic with no effect…
Before submission, the platform checks the completeness and correctness of every case against the fund's methodology: diagnosis and codes, justification of services, signatures and dates. You can see exactly what is keeping the case out of the "green zone" – and a case with a defect will not be submitted until it is fixed.
One glance – the whole picture: green zone or risk, across the clinic and by department. Updated weekly, problem spots are visible before submission to the fund, without spreadsheets or manual exports.
Four questions we hear at the first meeting almost word for word – and answers with no vague wording.
No. The platform is a layer: where the HIS has an API, we connect directly; where it does not, we work through its interface. KMIS or Damumed remain the main recording system.
The doctor does not have to learn a new program: they speak – the way they always have. We start with two or three doctors on the prototype; once colleagues go home without a stack of charts, the rest come around on their own.
The same documents from your HIS go to the fund, but every case is checked against the fund's methodology before submission, and the doctor confirms every record. It is not the submission format that changes – it is the number of defects in it.
Nowhere: medical data is processed within the clinic's perimeter and does not leave it. Access is segmented by role, and every platform action is logged. We work under an NDA.
We show the platform at work on examples close to your clinic: recording a visit, checking a case, the quality traffic light.
We take anonymized data and work out how visits, documentation and fund submission are set up specifically at your clinic.
We tune the prototype to your processes and HIS – in about a week. You see the platform on your own data and decide whether to go further.
Leave your contact details – we'll arrange a demo, review your processes and set up a prototype on top of your HIS. Doctors will see voice recording at their own visits before any commitment.
demo · process review · prototype – free
