aisol/solutions/quasi-public sector
solution · quasi-public sector

Meetings turn into directives. Directives turn into execution.

AI platform for national companies, holdings, social-entrepreneurship corporations and subordinate organizations: minutes ready within minutes after a meeting, every directive with an owner, a deadline and escalation, and regulations and tender documentation reviewed in hours. All of it: on top of your document management system and task tracker.

minutes in minutes 100% of directives tracked Kazakh + Russian
AISOL · Meeting outcomesboard session · 90 min
Meeting complete: recording processedminutes in 4 min
Minutes drafteddecisions and wording: taken from the meeting recording
Directives assigned: 12owners and deadlines set automatically
Deadline control switched onstatuses and reminders: no manual chasing
2 directives with no movement: escalated to the managerbefore the deadline slips
how it works · the execution chain

From a word in the meeting to a directive fulfilled

Usually days of manual work sit between a decision and its execution: minutes are compiled by hand, directives scatter across the document system, email and messengers, and statuses are gathered by phone. The platform walks this chain itself, step by step.

Meeting complete

minute 0

The session recording goes into processing. Kazakh and Russian speech, including mixed, is recognized at native level.

Minutes drafted

+4 minutes

Decisions and wording: from the transcript, following the organization's template. The secretariat reviews and sends for signature instead of writing from scratch.

Directives assigned

+10 minutes

Every directive gets an owner and a deadline from the meeting context. Notifications reach the responsible people in the document system and task tracker.

The platform keeps watch

every day

Statuses gather themselves: no calling owners, no summary spreadsheets before the next session.

Reminder, then escalation

2 days before the deadline

The owner gets a reminder in advance. A directive with no movement is escalated to the supervising manager, before the deadline slips.

Execution-discipline report

at any moment

A breakdown by department and subsidiary: for the session, for the report to the holding, on request. No overnight summaries against the reporting date.

The chain is closed: not a single directive is lost between the minutes and the report.

platform screens

One platform: two tracks of work

The chain above is the first track: meetings and directives. On the second track the platform reviews regulations and tender documentation. Both run on top of your document system and task tracker, replacing nothing.

track 01

Meetings and directives

Both sides of the cycle on screen: how minutes are born from a session recording and how the platform holds deadlines through to execution.

track 01 · minutes in minutes

The secretariat reviews the minutes instead of writing them

The platform listens to the meeting, captures decisions and assembles the minutes to the organization's template, complete with directives, owners and deadlines. People are left to review, sign and send.

  • Kazakh and Russian speech, including mixed, at native level
  • Decision wording comes from the transcript: nothing to dispute after the fact
  • Directives, owners and deadlines land straight in the document system and task tracker
AISOL · Meeting minutesboard of directors · 110 min
meeting recording → minutes

Resolved: approve the Q3 procurement plan; owner: procurement department, deadline: by August 15…

Decisions captured: 8wording from the transcript, following the minutes template
Directives created: 12owners and deadlines: from the meeting context
Notifications sent to ownersminutes and directives: in the document system and task tracker
Minutes ready to sign4 min after the meeting
track 01 · deadline control

Warned of a missed deadline days ahead, not at the next session

The execution picture stays alive on its own: statuses flow in without phone calls, and stalled directives rise to the top. A manager opens the breakdown and sees what is on time, what is stalling and where escalation is already on.

  • Statuses gather automatically: no one calls the owners
  • A reminder 2 days before the deadline; if it stalls, escalation to the manager
  • An execution-discipline breakdown at any moment, not against the reporting date
AISOL · Directive controlJuly · 148 directives
Procurementon time96%
Finance blockon time93%
Legal dept.2 being tracked84%
Directive #84: no movement for 5 daysowner has not reported · reminder sentattention
Directive #77: risk of deadline slipescalation: supervising deputy notifiedescalation
track 02

Regulations and tenders

The same principle, for documents: the platform reads regulations, legislative changes and tender documentation, and hands lawyers a finished review.

track 02 · document review

A lawyer gets a compliance checklist, not 214 pages

The platform extracts the requirements, deadlines and conditions from a document, checks each item against the organization's regulations and registries, and assembles a checklist: what is done, what to clarify, where the risk is.

  • Requirements and deadlines: extracted and laid out as checklist items
  • Each item has a status: compliant, needs clarification, risk
  • Regulatory changes are tracked: the platform reports who they affect
days → hoursto review a documentation package, instead of a week of manual reading
AISOL · Document reviewtender documentation · 214 pp.
Review complete: 1 risk, 1 needs clarification214 pp → 40 min
Requirements extracted: 46qualification, security deposit, submission deadlinesok
Compliance confirmed: 44 of 46against the organization's regulations and registriesok
Experience with similar contractssupporting documents for 3 years requiredcheck
Risk: non-compliance with clause 4.2the bid security amount does not match the calculationrisk
impact

What the organization gains

minutesfrom meeting to finished minutes, instead of days
100%of directives tracked: owners, deadlines, escalations
days → hoursto review regulations and tender documentation, with a compliance checklist
no scramblereporting on deadlines and execution is gathered automatically
embedding into the vertical

The platform embeds into the vertical, it does not rebuild it

The document system, access rights and two languages: three things that usually trip up rollouts. Here they are handled from day one.

No replacing the document system

Minutes and directives appear in your document system and task tracker: staff work where they are used to. Where there is an API, we connect directly; where there is not, the agent works through the system's interface.

Rights and an action log

Who sees what is up to you: an owner sees their directives, a manager sees their block, the board sees the whole picture. Every action the platform takes is logged and available for audit.

Kazakh and Russian in the minutes

Sessions in two languages intermixed are the normal mode: speech is recognized at native level, and minutes are produced in Kazakh, Russian or both.

frequent questions

What national companies and holdings ask

Meeting recordings and documents are processed inside the organization's perimeter and never leave it. We work under NDA and to the requirements for personal data and official information; access segmentation and an action log are standard platform mechanisms.
The platform is an add-on on top of your document system and task tracker, not a replacement for them. The model is event-driven: a meeting ends and minutes and directives are created; a deadline arrives and a status is requested and escalation switched on; a document comes in and a compliance checklist is assembled. Staff keep working in their familiar systems.
Yes, and we recommend it. A pilot on one directorate: meetings, directives and deadline control within a limited perimeter. Results show within weeks, then the platform scales to departments, subsidiaries and the group as a whole.
The demo, process review and prototype are free. A prototype on a recording of your real meeting takes about a week; production rollout: from 8 weeks. The model is a subscription; the configuration depends on the organization's scale and the set of scenarios, and we calculate it after the process review.
next step

We'll show the platform on your own meeting

Leave your contacts: we'll set up a demo and configure a prototype on a recording of your real meeting, with minutes, directives and deadline control on your own data, before any commitment.

demo · process review · prototype – free

Leave a request

Request sent. We'll get in touch within one business day.

By submitting the form you agree to the processing of personal data. We'll sign an NDA at the first meeting.